FREE STANDARD SHIPPING AND FREE SAMPLE FOR ALL DOMESTIC ORDERS OVER $50

Controversy Corner: Do We Absorb Sunscreen Filters Into Our Bloodstreams?

First Posted on June 2, 2022 in:insights & debunkssunscreen

In this blog post:

Headlines or Clickbait?

Real life vs. Laboratory Conditions

What we know today - Truth isn't always satisfying

Key Takeaways References for your... Reference

Every year, as things start to heat up, our thoughts turn once again to sunscreen. What SPF do I need? Mineral or chemical? Is this going to make me stickier than an ice cream on a hot day? How much should I use? (Hey Tiktok, it’s more than 2 fingers’ worth.)

To add to the noise, sunscreen often gets caught in the crosshairs of websites and newspapers alike. Not too long ago, there was an FDA bloodstream study that showed that sunscreen ingredients were found to be present in the bloodstream, lighting a match under a powder keg of alarmist headlines. Reading articles about ‘dangerous sunscreen chemicals’ leaching into our bodies is enough to make even the most steady sunscreen users twitch. 

Do sunscreen ingredients get into our bodies? Is it dangerous? Should I be worried? Let’s answer some of these questions so you can get back into the sun - with your SPF on, of course. 

Headlines or Clickbait?

The internet isn’t exactly, ahem, averse to drama. Well respected newspapers aren’t immune to the temptation to create consumer-tasty, fear-inducing headlines, causing many scientists to throw their hands up in resignation.  When a headline is inducing a knee-jerk reaction, odds are there is more to the story. This is definitely the case with sunscreen.

“Seven sunscreen chemicals enter bloodstream after one use, FDA says, but don’t abandon sun protection” - CNN, January 21, 2020.

“Sunscreen chemicals accumulate in body at high levels” - The Wall Street Journal, July 17, 2020.

“How safe is sunscreen?” - The New York Times, June 10, 2019. 

Don’t panic. Let’s not do anything crazy. Remember:

  • A headline doesn’t fully explain anything.  Headlines are grabby sound-bites, and often eclipse the rest of the article. There are sometimes important caveats in the text, or information from experts (the ones with science degrees).
  • Journalists aren’t scientists. Data interpretation can get messy, or even misleading, when it’s done by someone without the background to do it. Experts are telling us to keep wearing sunscreen. Some are even calling out the media for sensationalizing and misinterpreting the data.
  • It’s easier to throw one product under the bus than to accept a more complex, less satisfactory truth. It’s tidier. It makes people feel better. But it isn’t accurate. Yes, chemicals in sunscreen do get into our bodies. No, we don’t know exactly what the effect is yet. A lot of compounds get into our bodies (some of which we ingest), and the research on what it does is still ongoing.

  • One thing we can agree on? Casting doubt on a life-saving product like sunscreen as a whole is neither helpful, nor scientific. 

    Is This the Real World… or a Lab?

    Testing and safety standards are necessary, but not perfect. In the case of substances in the bloodstream, the FDA set a standard limit of 0.5ng/mL as a “safe” amount. For every substance. This sort of all- encompassing, non-substance specific standard doesn’t give us a clear idea of what a safe concentration of sunscreen is. 

    What should be considered an acceptable level of absorption really depends on the substance. For example, ethanol is considered toxic when it reaches 80000ng/mL - way past the 0.5ng/mL limit. Setting one amount as a standard limit for everything isn’t an accurate way of measuring the safety of many different substances. In the case of the FDA study, sunscreen actives were flagged for passing the 0.5ng/mL limit, but this doesn’t mean that the specific substances aren’t safe. 

    There’s also the issue of how well lab results are able to reflect real-world practices. In this study, a standard thickness of 2 mg/cm² was applied to 75% of the subject’s body, 4 times a day. If you think about your own sunscreen-wearing habits, it’s unlikely you’re applying that much product, over that much of your body, that many times a day. How much sunscreen the test subjects absorbed therefore probably wouldn’t be an accurate reflection of how much you would absorb with regular use. 

    Lastly, news is not always new news. Scientists have known that ingredients get absorbed into people’s urine and blood - this is why the established limit of 0.5 ng/mL was created. This information may have entered your radar recently, but it’s something scientists already knew. There’s no conspiracy here - so far, they haven’t found anything to justify changing how we use sunscreen. 

    Don't think of skin as a sponge

    The Truth is Not Always Satisfying

    What we know, is that more research is needed. We don’t really have conclusive results as to how the substances absorbed affect our bodies. While this isn’t the most satisfying ending to the sunscreen saga, it’s the most accurate. 

    We know that there’s no correlation between sunscreen filters and cancer or endocrine disruption. 

    We know that sunscreen is still an absolutely necessary product. It protects our skin from skin cancer and photo-aging. 

    We know that the kooky DIY “natural” sunscreen recipe you saw on YouTube is a no-no. 

    We don’t completely know how safe absorbed chemicals are, but we also don’t know that they aren't safe.

    The science machine keeps chugging on, and we’ll know more later.

    Takeaway

    • Headlines are designed to create drama, but don’t explain the whole issue.
    • Lab results don’t always do the best job reflecting how products are used in real world practices.
    • You should 100% still be using sunscreen every day, all day. 
    • Science is an ongoing process. Consumers are learning more about sunscreen, how much to apply, when to reapply etc. Scientists are still learning too.

    References

    • Matta MK, Florian J, Zusterzeel R, et al. Effect of Sunscreen Application on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active IngredientsA Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA. 2020;323(3):256–267. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20747
    • Michele, T. (2021, January 21). Shedding more light on sunscreen absorption. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-voices/shedding-more-light-sunscreen-absorption

    Related

    chemists how to choose sunscreen guide

    Chemists' Ultimate Sunscreen Application Guide

    We’ve hit sunscreen season again! With summer in full swing, the most important yet basic fundamental for good sunscreen protection is simply applying sunscreen correctly to safeguard skin from sunburns, risks of skin cancer, and premature skin aging. It’s not enough to just remember to use sunscreen here and there. Proper application (and re-application!) is key to ensuring you’re getting the proper, advertised level of sun protection throughout the day. So whether you’re got grandiose trave...

    Read more
    Sunscreen Challenge

    Results Summary for our 2023 30-for-30 Sunscreen Challenge

    In celebration of summer, we decided to test 30 different sunscreens over 30 days to see how these applied, how they held up over time, and even how they wash off. Please head to our TikTok and Instagram channel if you want to see the visuals. Otherwise here’s the running list of sunscreens we’ve tried, our rating, and why: *To help readers learn more about products showcased in this challenge, we built out and organized these results in Shop My Shelf. We do receive a small commission for usi...

    Read more